PENDULUM APPLIANCE – PROBLEMS AND POSSIBILITIES IN ITS APPLICATION AT DIFFERENT AGE PERIODS

1. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic treatment for the Class II non-compliant patient: current principles and techniques. Mosby, 2006. 2. Antonarakis G, Kiliaridis S. Molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliance in class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:133-140. 3. Fontana M, Cozzania M, Caprioglio A. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances: an overview of the last decade. Prog Orthod. 2012;13:173–184. 4. Hilgers J. The Pendulum appliance for ClassII non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:706- 714. 5. Wong A, Rabie A, HaeggU. The use of pendulum appliance in the treatement of class II malocclusion. Br Dent J. 1999;187:367-370. 6. Scuzzo G, Takemoto K, Pisani F. Maxillary molar distalization with a modifiet Pendulum appliance. J. Clin. Orthod. 1999;33:645-650. 7. Ghosh J, Nanda R. Evalution of intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dent Orthop. 1996;110:639-646. 8. Chaqués-Asensi J, Kalra V. Effects of the pendulum appliance on the dentofacial complex. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35:254–257. 9. Joseph AA, Butchart CJ. An evaluation of the pendulum distalizing appliance. Semin Orthod. 2010;6:129–135. 10. Bussick T, McNamara J. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dent Orthop. 2000;117:333-343. 11. Kinzinger G, Wehrbein H, Diedrich P. Molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance - In vitro analysis of the force systems and in vivo study in children and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:558- 567. 12. Kinzinger G. Bipendulum and quad pendulum for non-compliance molar distalization in adult patients. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63:154-162. 13. Kinzinger, G. et al. Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage. Am J Orthod Dent Orthop. 2004;125:8-23. 14. Flores-Mira C, McGrathb L, Heoc C, Major PW. Efficiency of molar distalization associated with second and third molar eruption stage A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(4):735-741. 15. Caprioglio A, Cozzani M, Fontana M. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:49-59 16. Yordanova G., Аssessment of dentoalveolar changes on upper permanent molar distalization using the M-pendulum, Еur. J. Orthod., 2012;34:5, e.296 17. Yordanova G. Pendulum Appliance – Clinics and Results. IJSR 2014;3(12):1647-1649. 18. Regina C. et al: Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliance, Eur. J. Orthod. 2009;31:333-340. 19. Mariani L, Maino G, Caprioglio A. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion dentoalveolar and skeletal effects. Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):43. 20. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J. An Improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) Method for the Assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(4):316-323. 21. Yordanova G. Clinical possibility in the treatment with M-Pendulum appliance. Dissertation. Sofia, Faculty of Dental Medicine, 2013. p211